Vulnerable Library - restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

Simple REST and HTTP API Client

Library home page: https://api.nuget.org/packages/restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

Path to dependency file: /KartaViewDemo/KartaViewDemo.csproj

Path to vulnerable library: /home/wss-scanner/.nuget/packages/restsharp/111.4.0/restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

## Vulnerabilities | CVE | Severity |

CVSS | Dependency | Type | Fixed in (restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg version) | Remediation Possible** | | ------------- | ------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------------- | --- | | [CVE-2024-45302](https://www.mend.io/vulnerability-database/CVE-2024-45302) |

**In some cases, Remediation PR cannot be created automatically for a vulnerability despite the availability of remediation

## Details

CVE-2024-45302

### Vulnerable Library - restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

Simple REST and HTTP API Client

Library home page: https://api.nuget.org/packages/restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

Path to dependency file: /KartaViewDemo/KartaViewDemo.csproj

Path to vulnerable library: /home/wss-scanner/.nuget/packages/restsharp/111.4.0/restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg

Dependency Hierarchy: - :x: **restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg** (Vulnerable Library)

Found in base branch: master

### Vulnerability Details

RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Publish Date: 2024-08-29

URL: CVE-2024-45302

### CVSS 3 Score Details (6.1)

Base Score Metrics: - Exploitability Metrics: - Attack Vector: Local - Attack Complexity: Low - Privileges Required: None - User Interaction: Required - Scope: Unchanged - Impact Metrics: - Confidentiality Impact: Low - Integrity Impact: None - Availability Impact: High

For more information on CVSS3 Scores, click here.

### Suggested Fix

Type: Upgrade version

Origin: https://github.com/restsharp/RestSharp/security/advisories/GHSA-4rr6-2v9v-wcpc

Release Date: 2024-08-29

Fix Resolution: RestSharp - 112.0.0

Step up your Open Source Security Game with Mend [here](https://www.whitesourcesoftware.com/full_solution_bolt_github)

restsharp.111.4.0.nupkg: 1 vulnerabilities (highest severity is: 6.1) - autoclosed #61

Company

Community

Support

Connect